build.gradle (1)

28-28: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Spring Security 의존성과 SecurityConfig 클래스 간의 불일치를 확인해주세요.

AI 요약에 따르면 SecurityConfig 클래스가 새로 추가되었다고 하는데, Spring Security 의존성이 주석 처리되어 있습니다. SecurityConfig를 사용하려면 해당 의존성이 필요합니다.

다음 스크립트로 SecurityConfig 클래스의 존재 여부를 확인해보겠습니다:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# SecurityConfig 클래스가 실제로 존재하는지 확인
fd -t f -e java | xargs grep -l "class SecurityConfig"

# Spring Security 관련 import가 있는지 확인
fd -t f -e java | xargs grep -l "org.springframework.security"

Length of output: 299

---

Spring Security 의존성 복원 필요

SecurityConfig 클래스(src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/config/SecurityConfig.java)와 MemberService(src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/MemberService.java)에서 org.springframework.security 패키지를 사용하고 있으나, build.gradle(28행)에서 해당 의존성이 주석 처리되어 있어 애플리케이션 구동 시 보안 설정이 적용되지 않습니다.

다음과 같이 build.gradle에서 Spring Security 의존성을 주석 해제해 주세요:

- 	// implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-security'
+ 	implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-security'

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

 	implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-security'

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In build.gradle at line 28, the Spring Security dependency is commented out, but
the project includes a SecurityConfig class and uses Spring Security packages.
To fix this, uncomment the line containing the Spring Security implementation
dependency so that the security configuration is properly applied during
application runtime.

.coderabbit.yaml (1)

15-15: ⚠️ Potential issue

파일 끝에 개행 문자를 추가해주세요.

YAMLlint에서 파일 끝에 개행 문자가 없다고 지적했습니다.

다음 diff를 적용해주세요:

 chat:
-  auto_reply: true
+  auto_reply: true
+

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

chat:
  auto_reply: true

🧰 Tools

🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 15-15: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In the .coderabbit.yaml file at line 15, add a newline character at the end of
the file to comply with YAMLlint requirements and avoid linting errors.

src/main/resources/application.properties (1)

18-19: ⚠️ Potential issue

JWT 시크릿 키의 보안을 강화해주세요.

현재 JWT 시크릿 키가 예측 가능한 패턴("fixlogfixlogfixlogfixlogfixlog1234")으로 되어 있어 보안상 취약합니다.

다음과 같이 개선하시기 바랍니다:

 # JWT
-jwt.secret-key=fixlogfixlogfixlogfixlogfixlog1234
+jwt.secret-key=${JWT_SECRET_KEY:your-very-long-and-random-secret-key-here}
 jwt.expiration-time=86400000

운영 환경에서는 환경 변수나 외부 설정을 통해 안전한 랜덤 키를 사용하시기 바랍니다.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

# JWT
jwt.secret-key=${JWT_SECRET_KEY:your-very-long-and-random-secret-key-here}
jwt.expiration-time=86400000

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/resources/application.properties at lines 18 to 19, the JWT secret
key is set to a predictable pattern which is insecure. Replace the hardcoded
secret key with a reference to an environment variable or external configuration
that provides a secure, random key at runtime, ensuring the secret is not
exposed in the codebase.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/fork/Fork.java (2)

24-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Post 참조 필드명들을 개선해주세요.

originalPostId와 forkedPostId 필드들도 실제로는 ID가 아닌 Post 엔티티를 참조하므로 명명을 개선해야 합니다.

 @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
 @JoinColumn(name = "post_id", nullable = false)
-private Post originalPostId;
+private Post originalPost;

 @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
 @JoinColumn(name = "fork_post_id", nullable = false)
-private Post forkedPostId;
+private Post forkedPost;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "post_id", nullable = false)
    private Post originalPost;

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "fork_post_id", nullable = false)
    private Post forkedPost;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/fork/Fork.java between lines 24 and
30, the fields originalPostId and forkedPostId are misnamed because they
reference Post entities, not just IDs. Rename these fields to originalPost and
forkedPost respectively to accurately reflect that they hold Post objects, not
just their IDs.

---

20-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

필드명을 목적에 맞게 수정해주세요.

userId 필드는 실제로 Member 엔티티를 참조하므로 user 또는 member로 명명하는 것이 더 적절합니다.

 @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
 @JoinColumn(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
-private Member userId;
+private Member user;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
    private Member user;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/fork/Fork.java around lines 20 to 22,
the field name 'userId' is misleading because it references a Member entity, not
just an ID. Rename the field from 'userId' to 'user' or 'member' to better
reflect its purpose as an entity reference.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/dto/post/PostResponseDto.java (1)

3-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

비어있는 DTO 클래스
현재 PostResponseDto에 필드나 메서드가 없어 응답 데이터를 담을 수 없습니다. 실제 API 스펙에 맞는 필드를 추가하거나, Lombok(@Getter, @builder) 또는 Java Record를 활용해 간결하게 정의하세요.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/dto/post/PostResponseDto.java at lines 3 to
4, the PostResponseDto class is empty and cannot hold any response data. Add
fields that match the actual API response specification to this DTO. To simplify
the code, consider using Lombok annotations like @Getter and @Builder or convert
the class into a Java Record to define it concisely with the necessary fields.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/dto/UserIdDto.java (1)

5-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

DTO 생성자 누락
Lombok @Getter만 선언된 상태로, Jackson 역직렬화를 위해 기본 생성자(@NoArgsConstructor) 및 전체 필드 생성자(@AllArgsConstructor)가 필요합니다. 다음과 같이 Lombok 애노테이션을 추가하거나 직접 생성자를 정의하세요.

@NoArgsConstructor
@AllArgsConstructor
@Getter
public class UserIdDto {
    private Long userId;
}

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/dto/UserIdDto.java lines 5 to 8, the class
only has the Lombok @Getter annotation, but it lacks the no-argument and
all-argument constructors needed for Jackson deserialization. Add the Lombok
annotations @NoArgsConstructor and @AllArgsConstructor above the class
declaration to generate these constructors automatically, ensuring proper DTO
instantiation during deserialization.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/dto/bookmark/response/BookmarkFolderCreateResponse.java (1)

3-3: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

필드 네이밍 카멜케이스 권장
Java 네이밍 컨벤션에 따라 folder_id 대신 folderId로 변경하고, JSON 직렬화 시 언더스코어 이름이 필요하면 @JsonProperty("folder_id")를 사용하세요.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In
src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/dto/bookmark/response/BookmarkFolderCreateResponse.java
at line 3, rename the field from folder_id to folderId to follow Java camelCase
naming conventions. To maintain the JSON property name as "folder_id" during
serialization, annotate the folderId field with @JsonProperty("folder_id"). This
ensures proper Java naming while preserving the expected JSON format.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/dto/member/SignupRequestDto.java (1)

8-13: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

유효성 검증 어노테이션을 추가하여 데이터 무결성을 보장하세요.

현재 DTO에 입력값 검증 로직이 없어 잘못된 데이터가 서비스 계층까지 전달될 수 있습니다. 다음과 같은 검증 어노테이션을 추가하는 것을 권장합니다:

+import javax.validation.constraints.Email;
+import javax.validation.constraints.NotBlank;
+import javax.validation.constraints.Size;

 @Getter
 @Setter
 public class SignupRequestDto {
+    @NotBlank(message = "이메일은 필수입니다")
+    @Email(message = "올바른 이메일 형식이 아닙니다")
     private String email;
     //비밀번호 재확인은 프론트단에서 확인
+    @NotBlank(message = "비밀번호는 필수입니다")
+    @Size(min = 8, message = "비밀번호는 최소 8자 이상이어야 합니다")
     private String password;
+    @NotBlank(message = "닉네임은 필수입니다")
+    @Size(max = 20, message = "닉네임은 20자를 초과할 수 없습니다")
     private String nickname;
 }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

import javax.validation.constraints.Email;
import javax.validation.constraints.NotBlank;
import javax.validation.constraints.Size;

@Getter
@Setter
public class SignupRequestDto {
    @NotBlank(message = "이메일은 필수입니다")
    @Email(message = "올바른 이메일 형식이 아닙니다")
    private String email;
    //비밀번호 재확인은 프론트단에서 확인
    @NotBlank(message = "비밀번호는 필수입니다")
    @Size(min = 8, message = "비밀번호는 최소 8자 이상이어야 합니다")
    private String password;
    @NotBlank(message = "닉네임은 필수입니다")
    @Size(max = 20, message = "닉네임은 20자를 초과할 수 없습니다")
    private String nickname;
}

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/dto/member/SignupRequestDto.java between
lines 8 and 13, the SignupRequestDto class lacks validation annotations, which
risks invalid data reaching the service layer. Add appropriate validation
annotations such as @NotBlank for email, password, and nickname fields, and
consider @Email for the email field to ensure data integrity at the DTO level.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/repository/MemberRepository.java (1)

9-10: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

데이터베이스 성능 최적화를 위한 인덱스 고려사항을 검토하세요.

findByEmail과 findByNickname 메서드는 빈번하게 사용될 것으로 예상됩니다. Member 엔티티의 email과 nickname 필드에 데이터베이스 인덱스가 적절히 설정되어 있는지 확인해보세요.

다음 스크립트로 Member 엔티티의 인덱스 설정을 확인해보겠습니다:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Member 엔티티에서 email, nickname 필드의 인덱스 어노테이션 확인
rg -A 5 -B 5 "@Column.*unique|@Index|email.*unique|nickname.*unique" src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/member/Member.java

Length of output: 129

---

인덱스 설정이 클래스 레벨(@table) 또는 컬럼 레벨(@column(unique=…))에 있는지 전체 어노테이션을 확인해보겠습니다.

이를 통해 @table(indexes=…), @column(unique=…) 등이 있는지 파악해 주세요.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Member.java의 모든 어노테이션 확인
rg -n "@.*" src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/member/Member.java

Length of output: 906

---

Member 엔티티 email & nickname 인덱스 검토 및 추가 필요

현재 Member 엔티티의 email 및 nickname 필드에 @Column(unique = true)나 클래스 레벨 @Table(indexes=…) 설정이 없습니다. 자주 조회되는 필드인 만큼 인덱스를 명시적으로 추가해 주세요.

수정 예시:

@@ class Member {
- @Column(nullable = false)
  private String email;
+ @Column(nullable = false, unique = true)
  private String email;

- @Column(nullable = false)
  private String nickname;
+ @Column(nullable = false, unique = true)
  private String nickname;

또는 클래스 상단에:

@Entity
@Table(name = "member",
       indexes = {
         @Index(name = "idx_member_email",    columnList = "email"),
         @Index(name = "idx_member_nickname", columnList = "nickname")
       }
)
public class Member { … }

• src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/member/Member.java: email, nickname 컬럼에 유니크/인덱스 설정 추가
• (선택) 클래스 레벨 @Table(indexes=…) 활용해 복합 인덱스 관리

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/member/Member.java around the email
and nickname field declarations, add database index annotations to optimize
query performance for the frequently used findByEmail and findByNickname
methods. Specifically, add @Column(unique = true) to the email and nickname
fields or add a class-level @Table annotation with indexes attribute defining
indexes on email and nickname columns. This will ensure the database creates
indexes on these columns, improving lookup speed.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/repository/bookmark/BookmarkRepository.java (1)

11-11: ⚠️ Potential issue

메서드명과 매개변수 타입이 일치하지 않습니다.

메서드명이 findByFolderIdAndPostId이지만 매개변수는 엔티티 객체를 받고 있습니다. 네이밍 컨벤션과 일치하도록 수정이 필요합니다.

다음과 같이 메서드명을 수정하는 것을 권장합니다:

-    Optional<Bookmark> findByFolderIdAndPostId(BookmarkFolder folderId, Post postId);
+    Optional<Bookmark> findByFolderAndPost(BookmarkFolder folder, Post post);

또는 실제로 ID를 매개변수로 받으려면:

-    Optional<Bookmark> findByFolderIdAndPostId(BookmarkFolder folderId, Post postId);
+    Optional<Bookmark> findByFolderIdAndPostId(Long folderId, Long postId);

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    Optional<Bookmark> findByFolderAndPost(BookmarkFolder folder, Post post);

    Optional<Bookmark> findByFolderIdAndPostId(Long folderId, Long postId);

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/repository/bookmark/BookmarkRepository.java
at line 11, the method name findByFolderIdAndPostId suggests it takes ID
parameters, but it currently accepts entity objects. To fix this, either rename
the method to findByFolderAndPost to match the entity parameters, or change the
parameter types to the corresponding ID types (e.g., Long folderId, Long postId)
to match the method name.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/repository/like/PostLikeRepository.java (1)

11-11: ⚠️ Potential issue

메서드명과 매개변수 타입 및 이름이 일치하지 않습니다.

메서드명이 findByUserIdAndPostId이지만 매개변수는 엔티티 객체를 받고 있고, 매개변수명 userId가 Member 타입과 일치하지 않습니다.

다음과 같이 수정하는 것을 권장합니다:

-    Optional<PostLike> findByUserIdAndPostId(Member userId, Post postId);
+    Optional<PostLike> findByUserAndPost(Member user, Post post);

또는 실제로 ID를 매개변수로 받으려면:

-    Optional<PostLike> findByUserIdAndPostId(Member userId, Post postId);
+    Optional<PostLike> findByUserIdAndPostId(Long userId, Long postId);

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    Optional<PostLike> findByUserAndPost(Member user, Post post);

    Optional<PostLike> findByUserIdAndPostId(Long userId, Long postId);

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/repository/like/PostLikeRepository.java at
line 11, the method name findByUserIdAndPostId does not match the parameter
types and names; it suggests using IDs but currently accepts entity objects with
mismatched parameter names. To fix this, either rename the method to reflect
that it accepts Member and Post entities or change the parameters to accept
userId and postId as ID types (e.g., Long) matching the method name.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/tag/TagCategory.java (1)

17-19: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

중복된 getter 메서드 제거 필요

@Getter 어노테이션이 이미 모든 필드에 대한 getter를 자동 생성하므로, 수동으로 작성된 getDisplayName() 메서드는 중복입니다.

다음과 같이 중복 메서드를 제거하세요:

-    public String getDisplayName() {
-        return displayName;
-    }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/tag/TagCategory.java around lines 17
to 19, the getDisplayName() method is redundant because the @Getter annotation
already generates getters for all fields. Remove the manually written
getDisplayName() method to avoid duplication and rely on the Lombok-generated
getter instead.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/post/PostTag.java (5)

19-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

필드명 개선 권장

필드명이 postId, tagId로 되어 있지만 실제로는 엔티티 객체를 참조하고 있어 혼란을 야기할 수 있습니다.

다음과 같이 필드명을 개선하는 것을 권장합니다:

     @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
     @JoinColumn(name = "post_id", nullable = false)
-    private Post postId;
+    private Post post;

     @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
     @JoinColumn(name = "tag_id", nullable = false)
-    private Tag tagId;
+    private Tag tag;

그리고 생성자도 함께 수정:

-    public PostTag(Post postId, Tag tagId){
-        this.postId = postId;
-        this.tagId = tagId;
+    public PostTag(Post post, Tag tag){
+        this.post = post;
+        this.tag = tag;
     }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "post_id", nullable = false)
    private Post post;

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "tag_id", nullable = false)
    private Tag tag;

    public PostTag(Post post, Tag tag) {
        this.post = post;
        this.tag = tag;
    }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/post/PostTag.java lines 19 to 25, the
fields named postId and tagId are misleading because they reference entity
objects, not just IDs. Rename these fields to post and tag respectively to
better reflect their purpose. Also, update the constructor parameters and
assignments to use the new field names accordingly.

---

12-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

JPA 엔티티에 equals와 hashCode 구현을 고려해주세요.

JPA 엔티티에서는 올바른 equals와 hashCode 구현이 중요합니다. 특히 연결 테이블 엔티티의 경우 더욱 그렇습니다.

+import java.util.Objects;

 @Entity
 @Getter
 @NoArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PROTECTED)
 public class PostTag {
     // ... 기존 코드 ...
+    
+    @Override
+    public boolean equals(Object o) {
+        if (this == o) return true;
+        if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
+        PostTag postTag = (PostTag) o;
+        return Objects.equals(post, postTag.post) && Objects.equals(tag, postTag.tag);
+    }
+    
+    @Override
+    public int hashCode() {
+        return Objects.hash(post, tag);
+    }
 }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/post/PostTag.java between lines 12
and 31, the PostTag JPA entity lacks equals and hashCode methods. Implement
these methods based on the entity's identifier fields or business keys to ensure
correct behavior in collections and when comparing entities. Use both postId and
tagId fields in the equals and hashCode implementations to properly represent
the composite identity of this join entity.

---

25-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

필드명을 더 명확하게 변경해주세요.

마찬가지로 tagId도 tag로 변경하는 것이 좋겠습니다.

 @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
 @JoinColumn(name = "tag_id", nullable = false)
-private Tag tagId;
+private Tag tag;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

 @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
 @JoinColumn(name = "tag_id", nullable = false)
 private Tag tag;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/post/PostTag.java at line 25, the
field name 'tagId' is unclear. Rename the field from 'tagId' to 'tag' to better
represent that it holds a Tag object rather than just an ID.

---

21-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

필드명을 더 명확하게 변경해주세요.

필드명이 postId이지만 실제로는 Post 엔티티를 참조하고 있어 혼란을 줄 수 있습니다. post로 변경하는 것이 좋겠습니다.

 @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
 @JoinColumn(name = "post_id", nullable = false)
-private Post postId;
+private Post post;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

 @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
 @JoinColumn(name = "post_id", nullable = false)
 private Post post;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/post/PostTag.java at line 21, the
field name 'postId' is misleading because it actually references a Post entity,
not just an ID. Rename the field from 'postId' to 'post' to clearly indicate it
holds a Post object, improving code clarity and reducing confusion.

---

27-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

생성자 매개변수명도 함께 수정해주세요.

필드명 변경에 맞춰 생성자도 수정이 필요합니다.

-public PostTag(Post postId, Tag tagId){
-    this.postId = postId;
-    this.tagId = tagId;
+public PostTag(Post post, Tag tag){
+    this.post = post;
+    this.tag = tag;
 }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    public PostTag(Post post, Tag tag){
        this.post = post;
        this.tag = tag;
    }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/post/PostTag.java around lines 27 to
30, the constructor parameter names do not match the updated field names. Rename
the constructor parameters to match the current field names for clarity and
consistency, then assign them correctly to the fields inside the constructor.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/config/SecurityConfig.java (1)

1-31: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

시큐리티 설정 상태 확인 필요

전체 시큐리티 설정이 주석 처리되어 있습니다. 이것이 임시적인 것인지, 아니면 다른 이유가 있는지 확인이 필요합니다.

PR 목표가 로그인 기능인데 시큐리티 설정이 비활성화되어 있는 이유를 확인해주세요.

다음을 검증해보겠습니다:

만약 개발 단계에서 임시로 비활성화한 것이라면, 향후 활성화 계획과 함께 TODO 주석을 추가하는 것을 권장합니다.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# build.gradle에서 시큐리티 의존성 상태 확인
echo "=== Checking security dependencies in build.gradle ==="
fd "build.gradle" --exec cat {} | grep -A 5 -B 5 "security"

# 다른 시큐리티 관련 설정 파일 확인
echo "=== Checking for other security configurations ==="
rg -l "SecurityConfig\|WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter\|@EnableWebSecurity" --type java

Length of output: 789

---

시큐리티 설정 완전 비활성화 확인

아래와 같이 Spring Security 의존성과 설정이 모두 주석 처리되어 있습니다.
이 상태가 개발 단계의 임시 조치인지, 아니면 다른 의도가 있는지 확인 부탁드립니다.

• build.gradle

  dependencies {
  -   // implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-security'
      implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-data-jpa'
      implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-web'
      …
  }

• src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/config/SecurityConfig.java
  클래스 전체가 주석 처리되어 있어 실제 보안 체인이 등록되지 않음

만약 의도된 임시 비활성화라면,

1. 향후 보안 설정을 재활성화할 시점 및 계획을 명시하는 TODO 주석 추가
2. PR 또는 이슈로 재활성화 일정 관리

위 조치가 필요하지 않은 상황이라면, 비활성화 사유를 간단히 공유 부탁드립니다.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/config/SecurityConfig.java lines 1 to 31,
the entire security configuration class is commented out, disabling Spring
Security setup. Verify if this is a temporary measure during development; if so,
add a TODO comment explaining when and how the security configuration will be
re-enabled, and ensure the reactivation plan is tracked in a PR or issue. If not
temporary, provide a brief explanation for the intentional deactivation.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/repository/bookmark/BookmarkFolderRepository.java (1)

11-12: ⚠️ Potential issue

메서드명과 반환 타입 개선이 필요합니다.

Repository 인터페이스에 몇 가지 중요한 문제점이 있습니다.

다음과 같이 수정하는 것을 권장합니다:

-    Page<BookmarkFolder> findAllByUserId(Member userId, Pageable pageable);
-    BookmarkFolder findByUserId(Member userId);
+    Page<BookmarkFolder> findAllByUser(Member user, Pageable pageable);
+    Optional<BookmarkFolder> findByUser(Member user);

주요 개선사항:

1. 네이밍 일관성: userId라는 메서드명이지만 파라미터 타입이 Member이므로 User로 변경
2. Null 안전성: findByUser는 결과가 없을 수 있으므로 Optional<BookmarkFolder>를 반환해야 함
3. Spring Data JPA 규칙: 엔티티 간 관계에서는 필드명과 일치하는 메서드명 사용 권장

추가로 import 문도 필요합니다:

+import java.util.Optional;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In
src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/repository/bookmark/BookmarkFolderRepository.java
around lines 11 to 12, rename the method parameters from 'userId' to 'user' to
match the Member type, change the return type of findByUser to
Optional<BookmarkFolder> for null safety, and update method names to align with
entity field names following Spring Data JPA conventions. Also, add necessary
import statements for Optional and any other required classes.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/mock/BookmarkFolderTestDataInitializer.java (1)

13-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

프로덕션 환경에서의 실행을 방지하는 프로파일 설정을 고려해보세요.

현재 코드는 모든 환경에서 실행될 수 있습니다. 테스트 데이터 초기화는 개발/테스트 환경에서만 실행되어야 합니다.

+@Profile({"dev", "test"})
 @Component
 @RequiredArgsConstructor
 public class BookmarkFolderTestDataInitializer implements CommandLineRunner {

필요한 import 추가:

+import org.springframework.context.annotation.Profile;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

// add this import alongside your other imports
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Profile;

@Profile({"dev", "test"})
@Component
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class BookmarkFolderTestDataInitializer implements CommandLineRunner {

    private final MemberRepository memberRepository;
    private final BookmarkFolderRepository bookmarkFolderRepository;

    @Override
    public void run(String... args) {
        if (bookmarkFolderRepository.count() == 0) {
            Member member = memberRepository.findByEmail("[email protected]")
                    .orElseThrow(() -> new IllegalStateException("[email protected] 사용자가 존재하지 않습니다."));

            BookmarkFolder defaultFolder = new BookmarkFolder(member, "default folder");
            BookmarkFolder etcFolder = new BookmarkFolder(member, "그외 폴더");

            bookmarkFolderRepository.saveAll(List.of(defaultFolder, etcFolder));

            System.out.println("테스트용 북마크 폴더 2개 생성 완료");
        }
    }
}

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/mock/BookmarkFolderTestDataInitializer.java
around lines 13 to 33, the test data initializer runs in all environments, which
is not ideal. Restrict execution to development or test profiles by adding a
@Profile annotation (e.g., @Profile("dev") or @Profile({"dev", "test"})) on the
class. Also, add the necessary import for the @Profile annotation from
org.springframework.context.annotation.Profile.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/controller/PostController.java (1)

18-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

요청 유효성 검증과 보안을 강화해보세요.

현재 컨트롤러에는 요청 데이터 검증과 인증/인가 처리가 없습니다. 다음 개선사항을 고려해보세요:

+import jakarta.validation.Valid;
+import org.springframework.security.core.annotation.AuthenticationPrincipal;
+import org.springframework.http.HttpStatus;
+import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.ResponseStatus;

     @PostMapping
+    @ResponseStatus(HttpStatus.CREATED)
-    public Response<Object> createPost(@RequestBody PostRequestDto postRequestDto){
+    public Response<Object> createPost(@Valid @RequestBody PostRequestDto postRequestDto,
+                                       @AuthenticationPrincipal String username){
         postService.createPost(postRequestDto);
         return Response.success("게시글 작성 성공.", null);
     }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

import jakarta.validation.Valid;
import org.springframework.security.core.annotation.AuthenticationPrincipal;
import org.springframework.http.HttpStatus;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.ResponseStatus;

    @PostMapping
    @ResponseStatus(HttpStatus.CREATED)
    public Response<Object> createPost(
        @Valid @RequestBody PostRequestDto postRequestDto,
        @AuthenticationPrincipal String username
    ) {
        postService.createPost(postRequestDto);
        return Response.success("게시글 작성 성공.", null);
    }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/controller/PostController.java around lines
18 to 22, the createPost method lacks request validation and security checks.
Add validation annotations to the PostRequestDto fields and use @Valid on the
method parameter to enforce validation. Also, integrate authentication and
authorization checks, such as using Spring Security annotations like
@PreAuthorize or checking the authenticated user, to ensure only authorized
users can create posts.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/follow/Follow.java (2)

9-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

중복 팔로우 방지를 위한 복합 유니크 제약조건을 추가하세요.

동일한 사용자가 같은 대상을 여러 번 팔로우하는 것을 방지하기 위해 데이터베이스 레벨에서 유니크 제약조건을 설정하는 것이 좋습니다.

 @Entity
+@Table(uniqueConstraints = {
+    @UniqueConstraint(columnNames = {"follower_id", "following_id"})
+})
 @Getter
 @NoArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PROTECTED)
 public class Follow {

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

@Entity
@Table(uniqueConstraints = {
    @UniqueConstraint(columnNames = {"follower_id", "following_id"})
})
@Getter
@NoArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PROTECTED)
public class Follow {
    // ...
}

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/follow/Follow.java around lines 9 to
12, add a composite unique constraint at the entity level to prevent duplicate
follows by the same user on the same target. Modify the @Entity annotation or
add a @Table annotation with a uniqueConstraints attribute specifying the
combination of user and target fields to enforce uniqueness at the database
level.

---

20-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

필드 네이밍을 개선하여 혼동을 방지하세요.

followerId와 followingId는 실제로는 Member 엔티티를 참조하는데 필드명이 Id로 끝나서 Long 타입의 식별자처럼 보입니다. 더 명확한 네이밍을 사용하는 것을 권장합니다.

-    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
-    @JoinColumn(name = "followerId", nullable = false)
-    private Member followerId;
-
-    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
-    @JoinColumn(name = "following_id", nullable = false)
-    private Member followingId;
+    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
+    @JoinColumn(name = "follower_id", nullable = false)
+    private Member follower;
+
+    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
+    @JoinColumn(name = "following_id", nullable = false)
+    private Member following;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "follower_id", nullable = false)
    private Member follower;

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "following_id", nullable = false)
    private Member following;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/follow/Follow.java around lines 20 to
25, the fields followerId and followingId are misleadingly named as if they were
Long identifiers, but they actually reference Member entities. Rename these
fields to follower and following respectively to clearly indicate they hold
Member objects, avoiding confusion with ID fields.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/exception/GlobalExceptionHandler.java (2)

10-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

메서드명을 실제 기능에 맞게 수정하세요.

handleDuplicateException 메서드명은 중복 예외만 처리하는 것처럼 보이지만, 실제로는 모든 CustomException을 처리합니다. 더 일반적인 이름으로 변경하는 것이 좋습니다.

     @ExceptionHandler(CustomException.class)
-    protected ResponseEntity<Response<?>> handleDuplicateException(CustomException ex) {
+    protected ResponseEntity<Response<?>> handleCustomException(CustomException ex) {

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @ExceptionHandler(CustomException.class)
    protected ResponseEntity<Response<?>> handleCustomException(CustomException ex) {

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/exception/GlobalExceptionHandler.java around
lines 10 to 11, the method name handleDuplicateException suggests it only
handles duplicate exceptions, but it actually handles all CustomException types.
Rename the method to a more general name like handleCustomException to
accurately reflect its purpose.

---

14-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

프로덕션 환경을 고려하여 로깅 프레임워크를 사용하세요.

printStackTrace()는 프로덕션 환경에서 보안상 위험하고 성능에도 좋지 않습니다. 로깅 프레임워크를 사용하여 적절한 로그 레벨로 기록하는 것을 권장합니다.

클래스 상단에 로거를 추가하고:

+import lombok.extern.slf4j.Slf4j;
+
+@Slf4j
 @RestControllerAdvice
 public class GlobalExceptionHandler {

그리고 printStackTrace를 로깅으로 교체:

-        ex.printStackTrace();
+        log.error("Custom exception occurred: {}", errorCode.getMessage(), ex);

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

// at the top of the file, among other imports
import lombok.extern.slf4j.Slf4j;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.ExceptionHandler;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RestControllerAdvice;
// ... other imports

@Slf4j
@RestControllerAdvice
public class GlobalExceptionHandler {

    @ExceptionHandler(CustomException.class)
    public ErrorResponse handleCustomException(CustomException ex) {
        ErrorCode errorCode = ex.getErrorCode();
        // replaced printStackTrace() with a proper log call
        log.error("Custom exception occurred: {}", errorCode.getMessage(), ex);
        return new ErrorResponse(
            errorCode.getStatus(),
            errorCode.getErrorCode(),
            errorCode.getMessage()
        );
    }

    // ... other handlers
}

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/exception/GlobalExceptionHandler.java at
line 14, replace the use of ex.printStackTrace() with a proper logging framework
call. First, add a logger instance at the top of the class using a logging
framework like SLF4J or Log4j. Then, change the printStackTrace() call to log
the exception with an appropriate log level such as error or warn, including the
exception message and stack trace.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/like/PostLike.java (3)

36-38: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

메서드명을 자바 네이밍 컨벤션에 맞게 수정하세요.

ToggleLike 메서드명이 대문자로 시작하고 있습니다. 자바에서는 메서드명을 camelCase로 작성해야 합니다.

-    public void ToggleLike(boolean state){
+    public void toggleLike(boolean state){
         this.isLiked = state;
     }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    public void toggleLike(boolean state){
        this.isLiked = state;
    }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/like/PostLike.java around lines 36 to
38, the method name ToggleLike starts with an uppercase letter, which violates
Java naming conventions. Rename the method to toggleLike using camelCase to
comply with Java standards.

---

20-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

필드 네이밍을 개선하여 혼동을 방지하세요.

userId와 postId는 실제로는 Member와 Post 엔티티를 참조하는데 필드명이 Id로 끝나서 Long 타입의 식별자처럼 보입니다. 더 명확한 네이밍을 사용하는 것을 권장합니다.

-    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
-    @JoinColumn(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
-    private Member userId;
-
-    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
-    @JoinColumn(name = "post_id", nullable = false)
-    private Post postId;
+    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
+    @JoinColumn(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
+    private Member member;
+
+    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
+    @JoinColumn(name = "post_id", nullable = false)
+    private Post post;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
    private Member member;

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "post_id", nullable = false)
    private Post post;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/like/PostLike.java around lines 20 to
26, the fields named userId and postId are misleading because they reference
Member and Post entities, not just their IDs. Rename these fields to user and
post respectively to clearly indicate they hold entity references, avoiding
confusion with Long type identifiers.

---

10-13: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

중복 좋아요 방지를 위한 복합 유니크 제약조건을 추가하세요.

동일한 사용자가 같은 게시글에 여러 번 좋아요를 누르는 것을 방지하기 위해 데이터베이스 레벨에서 유니크 제약조건을 설정하는 것이 좋습니다.

 @Entity
+@Table(uniqueConstraints = {
+    @UniqueConstraint(columnNames = {"user_id", "post_id"})
+})
 @Getter
 @NoArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PROTECTED)
 public class PostLike {

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

@Entity
@Table(uniqueConstraints = {
    @UniqueConstraint(columnNames = {"user_id", "post_id"})
})
@Getter
@NoArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PROTECTED)
public class PostLike {

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/like/PostLike.java around lines 10 to
13, add a composite unique constraint at the entity level to prevent duplicate
likes by the same user on the same post. Modify the @Entity annotation or add a
@Table annotation with a uniqueConstraints attribute specifying the combination
of user and post fields to enforce uniqueness in the database schema.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/member/Member.java (2)

63-64: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

필드 네이밍을 개선하여 혼동을 방지하세요.

bookmarkFolderId 필드는 실제로는 BookmarkFolder 엔티티를 참조하는데 필드명이 Id로 끝나서 Long 타입의 식별자처럼 보입니다. 더 명확한 네이밍을 사용하는 것을 권장합니다.

-    @OneToOne(mappedBy = "userId", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
-    private BookmarkFolder bookmarkFolderId;
+    @OneToOne(mappedBy = "userId", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
+    private BookmarkFolder bookmarkFolder;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @OneToOne(mappedBy = "userId", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
    private BookmarkFolder bookmarkFolder;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/member/Member.java at lines 63-64,
the field name bookmarkFolderId is misleading because it suggests a Long
identifier, but it actually references a BookmarkFolder entity. Rename the field
to bookmarkFolder or another clear name that reflects it is an entity reference,
not an ID, to avoid confusion.

---

31-32: ⚠️ Potential issue

비밀번호 암호화를 고려하세요.

현재 비밀번호가 평문으로 저장되는 것으로 보입니다. 보안을 위해 Spring Security의 PasswordEncoder를 사용하여 암호화하는 것을 강력히 권장합니다.

+import org.springframework.security.crypto.password.PasswordEncoder;
+
 public class Member {
     // ... 다른 필드들
     
-    @Column(nullable = false)
-    private String password;
+    @Column(nullable = false)
+    private String encodedPassword;

그리고 정적 팩토리 메서드에서:

-    public static Member of(String email, String password, String nickname, SocialType socialType) {
+    public static Member of(String email, String password, String nickname, SocialType socialType, PasswordEncoder passwordEncoder) {
         Member member = new Member();
         member.email = email;
-        member.password = password;
+        member.encodedPassword = passwordEncoder.encode(password);
         member.nickname = nickname;
         member.socialType = socialType;
         member.isDeleted = false;
         return member;
     }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/member/Member.java at lines 31-32,
the password field is stored as plain text, which is insecure. To fix this,
integrate Spring Security's PasswordEncoder to encrypt the password before
saving it. Modify the code to encode the password using PasswordEncoder in the
member creation or update methods, especially within any static factory methods,
ensuring only the encrypted password is stored in this field.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/MemberService.java (1)

1-56: ⚠️ Potential issue

전체 서비스 클래스가 주석 처리되어 있습니다.

전체 MemberService 클래스가 주석으로 처리되어 있는 것은 심각한 문제입니다. 이는 다음과 같은 상황을 의미할 수 있습니다:

• 미완성된 구현
• 디버깅 과정에서 남겨진 코드
• 제거되어야 할 코드

프로덕션 코드베이스에서 전체 클래스를 주석 처리하는 것은 권장되지 않습니다.

다음 중 하나의 조치를 취해주세요:

# 옵션 1: 주석을 제거하고 서비스를 활성화
- //package com.example.fixlog.service;
+ package com.example.fixlog.service;

# 옵션 2: 파일 자체를 제거 (사용하지 않는 경우)

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/MemberService.java lines 1 to 56,
the entire MemberService class is commented out, which is inappropriate for
production code. You should either uncomment the entire class if it is complete
and ready for use, or if it is incomplete or deprecated, remove the commented
code entirely to keep the codebase clean. Ensure the class is properly annotated
and structured if you choose to uncomment it.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/mock/MemberTestDataInitializer.java (2)

14-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

테스트 데이터 초기화 프로파일 분리를 고려해보세요.

테스트 데이터 초기화가 항상 실행되는 것은 프로덕션 환경에서 문제가 될 수 있습니다.

프로파일 기반 조건부 실행을 추가하는 것을 권장합니다:

+ import org.springframework.context.annotation.Profile;

+ @Profile({"dev", "test"})
@Component
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class MemberTestDataInitializer implements CommandLineRunner {

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/mock/MemberTestDataInitializer.java around
lines 14 to 16, the MemberTestDataInitializer class currently runs in all
environments, which can cause issues in production. Modify the class to run
conditionally based on a Spring profile by adding a @Profile annotation with a
test-specific profile (e.g., "test" or "dev"). This ensures the test data
initialization only executes in designated environments and not in production.

---

24-26: ⚠️ Potential issue

테스트 데이터의 보안 취약점을 수정해주세요.

하드코딩된 평문 비밀번호를 사용하고 있습니다. 실제 MemberService에서는 PasswordEncoder를 사용하는데, 테스트 데이터에서는 평문 비밀번호를 사용하면 일관성 문제와 보안 위험이 있습니다.

비밀번호 인코딩을 적용해주세요:

+ private final PasswordEncoder passwordEncoder;

- Member member1 = Member.of("[email protected]", "1234", "가나다", SocialType.EMAIL);
- Member member2 = Member.of("[email protected]", "1234", "라마바", SocialType.EMAIL);
+ Member member1 = Member.of("[email protected]", passwordEncoder.encode("1234"), "가나다", SocialType.EMAIL);
+ Member member2 = Member.of("[email protected]", passwordEncoder.encode("1234"), "라마바", SocialType.EMAIL);

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/mock/MemberTestDataInitializer.java around
lines 24 to 26, the test data uses hardcoded plain text passwords which is a
security risk and inconsistent with the actual MemberService that uses
PasswordEncoder. Modify the code to encode the passwords using the
PasswordEncoder before saving the members. Inject or obtain a PasswordEncoder
instance and apply it to the passwords when creating Member objects to ensure
passwords are stored encoded in the test data.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/repository/follow/FollowRepository.java (1)

11-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

메서드 이름과 파라미터 타입의 불일치 수정 필요

메서드 이름에 Id가 포함되어 있지만 실제 파라미터는 Member 엔티티를 받고 있어 혼란을 야기할 수 있습니다.

다음과 같이 메서드 이름을 수정하여 일관성을 확보하는 것을 권장합니다:

-    boolean existsByFollowerIdAndFollowingId(Member follower, Member following);
-    Optional<Follow> findByFollowerIdAndFollowingId(Member follower, Member following);
-    List<Follow> findByFollowingId(Member following);
-    List<Follow> findByFollowerId(Member follower);
+    boolean existsByFollowerAndFollowing(Member follower, Member following);
+    Optional<Follow> findByFollowerAndFollowing(Member follower, Member following);
+    List<Follow> findByFollowing(Member following);
+    List<Follow> findByFollower(Member follower);

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    boolean existsByFollowerAndFollowing(Member follower, Member following);
    Optional<Follow> findByFollowerAndFollowing(Member follower, Member following);
    List<Follow> findByFollowing(Member following);
    List<Follow> findByFollower(Member follower);

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/repository/follow/FollowRepository.java
around lines 11 to 14, the method names include 'Id' but the parameters are
Member entities, causing inconsistency. Rename the methods to remove 'Id' from
their names to match the parameter types, for example, change
existsByFollowerIdAndFollowingId to existsByFollowerAndFollowing, and similarly
for the other methods, ensuring method names accurately reflect their
parameters.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/bookmark/Bookmark.java (3)

41-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

메서드명 네이밍 규칙 준수

ToggleBookmark 메서드명이 Java 네이밍 규칙을 따르지 않습니다. 메서드명은 camelCase를 사용해야 합니다.

-    public void ToggleBookmark(boolean state){
+    public void toggleBookmark(boolean state){

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    public void toggleBookmark(boolean state){
        this.isMarked = state;
    }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/bookmark/Bookmark.java around lines
41 to 43, the method name ToggleBookmark does not follow Java camelCase naming
conventions. Rename the method to toggleBookmark to comply with standard Java
method naming rules.

---

32-34: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

메서드 파라미터명과 일관성 유지

필드명을 변경하는 경우 메서드도 함께 수정이 필요합니다.

-    public void moveToFolder(BookmarkFolder newFolder) {
-        this.folderId = newFolder;
+    public void moveToFolder(BookmarkFolder newFolder) {
+        this.folder = newFolder;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    public void moveToFolder(BookmarkFolder newFolder) {
        this.folder = newFolder;
    }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/bookmark/Bookmark.java around lines
32 to 34, the method moveToFolder assigns the parameter newFolder directly to
folderId, which is inconsistent because folderId likely expects an ID, not a
BookmarkFolder object. To fix this, update the method to assign the ID from
newFolder to folderId, ensuring the parameter and field usage are consistent.

---

22-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

필드명 개선 필요

postId와 folderId 필드명이 혼란스럽습니다. 이들은 실제로는 ID가 아닌 엔티티 참조이므로 더 명확한 이름을 사용하는 것이 좋습니다.

-    @ManyToOne
-    @JoinColumn(name = "post_id")
-    private Post postId;
-
-    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
-    @JoinColumn(name = "folder_id")
-    private BookmarkFolder folderId;
+    @ManyToOne
+    @JoinColumn(name = "post_id")
+    private Post post;
+
+    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
+    @JoinColumn(name = "folder_id")
+    private BookmarkFolder folder;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @ManyToOne
    @JoinColumn(name = "post_id")
    private Post post;

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "folder_id")
    private BookmarkFolder folder;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/bookmark/Bookmark.java between lines
22 and 28, the fields named postId and folderId are misleading because they
represent entity references, not just IDs. Rename postId to post and folderId to
folder to clearly indicate these fields hold entity objects, improving code
readability and clarity.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/bookmark/BookmarkFolder.java (3)

29-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

매핑 속성명 일관성 유지

필드명을 변경하는 경우 mappedBy 속성도 함께 수정이 필요합니다.

-    @OneToMany(mappedBy = "folderId", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
+    @OneToMany(mappedBy = "folder", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/bookmark/BookmarkFolder.java at lines
29 to 30, the mappedBy attribute in the @OneToMany annotation uses "folderId"
which must match the field name in the Bookmark entity. Verify the actual field
name in Bookmark that refers to BookmarkFolder and update the mappedBy value
accordingly to maintain consistency between the entities.

---

37-40: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

생성자 파라미터명 일관성 유지

필드명 변경에 따라 생성자의 파라미터명도 수정이 필요합니다.

-    public BookmarkFolder( Member userId, String name) {
-        this.userId = userId;
+    public BookmarkFolder( Member member, String name) {
+        this.member = member;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    public BookmarkFolder( Member member, String name) {
        this.member = member;
        this.folderName = name;
    }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/bookmark/BookmarkFolder.java around
lines 37 to 40, the constructor parameter names are inconsistent with the
updated field names. Rename the constructor parameters to match the field names
for clarity and consistency, such as changing 'userId' to 'user' and 'name' to
'folderName', and update the assignments accordingly.

---

25-27: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

관계 매핑과 필드명 재검토 필요

두 가지 문제가 있습니다:

1. userId 필드명이 혼란스럽습니다 (실제로는 Member 엔티티)
2. @OneToOne 관계가 적절한지 검토가 필요합니다. 일반적으로 사용자는 여러 북마크 폴더를 가질 수 있어야 합니다.

-    @OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
-    @JoinColumn(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
-    private Member userId;
+    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
+    @JoinColumn(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
+    private Member member;

사용자가 여러 북마크 폴더를 가질 수 있는 요구사항인지 확인해주세요. 만약 그렇다면 @OneToOne을 @ManyToOne으로 변경해야 합니다.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Member 엔티티 정의 및 BookmarkFolder 참조 확인 스크립트

# 1. Member 엔티티 클래스 본문 검색
echo "=== Member 클래스 정의 ==="
rg "class Member" -A 30 -n src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain

echo
# 2. Member 클래스 내 BookmarkFolder 참조 검색
echo "=== Member 클래스 내 BookmarkFolder 참조 ==="
rg "BookmarkFolder" -n src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain

Length of output: 3924

---

BookmarkFolder–Member 관계 매핑 및 네이밍 수정 필요

현재 BookmarkFolder와 Member 간 양방향 OneToOne 매핑이 비즈니스 요구(사용자 당 다수 폴더) 및 코드 주석(List<BookmarkFolder>) 의도와 일치하지 않습니다. 다음을 적용해주세요:

• src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/bookmark/BookmarkFolder.java

• @OneToOne → @ManyToOne
• 필드명 userId → member

-    @OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
-    @JoinColumn(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
-    private Member userId;
+    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
+    @JoinColumn(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
+    private Member member;

• src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/member/Member.java

• 단일 BookmarkFolder 필드 제거
• @OneToMany → List<BookmarkFolder> bookmarkFolders 추가

-    private BookmarkFolder bookmarkFolderId;
+    @OneToMany(mappedBy = "member", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
+    private List<BookmarkFolder> bookmarkFolders = new ArrayList<>();

위 수정으로 “사용자 당 여러 북마크 폴더” 요구사항을 충족할 수 있습니다.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    @JoinColumn(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
    private Member member;

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/bookmark/BookmarkFolder.java lines 25
to 27, change the relationship annotation from @OneToOne to @ManyToOne to
reflect that a Member can have multiple BookmarkFolders, and rename the field
from userId to member for clarity. Additionally, in
src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/member/Member.java, remove any single
BookmarkFolder field and instead add a @OneToMany annotated List<BookmarkFolder>
bookmarkFolders to represent the multiple folders per user. This aligns the code
with the business requirement that a user can have multiple bookmark folders.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/dto/post/PostRequestDto.java (1)

8-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

유효성 검증 어노테이션 추가 고려

DTO에 유효성 검증 어노테이션을 추가하여 데이터 무결성을 보장하는 것을 권장합니다.

+import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotBlank;
+import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotNull;
+import jakarta.validation.constraints.Size;

 @Getter
 public class PostRequestDto {
     private Long userId; // Fixme : 회원가입 구현 후 삭제 예정
+    
+    @NotBlank(message = "포스트 제목은 필수입니다")
+    @Size(max = 255, message = "포스트 제목은 255자를 초과할 수 없습니다")
     private String postTitle;
+    
     private String coverImageUrl;
+    
+    @NotBlank(message = "문제 설명은 필수입니다")
     private String problem;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

// Add these imports at the top of the file
import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotBlank;
import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotNull;
import jakarta.validation.constraints.Size;

@Getter
public class PostRequestDto {
    private Long userId; // Fixme : 회원가입 구현 후 삭제 예정

    @NotBlank(message = "포스트 제목은 필수입니다")
    @Size(max = 255, message = "포스트 제목은 255자를 초과할 수 없습니다")
    private String postTitle;

    private String coverImageUrl;

    @NotBlank(message = "문제 설명은 필수입니다")
    private String problem;

    private String errorMessage;
    private String environment;
    private String reproduceCode;
    private String solutionCode;
    private String causeAnalysis;
    private String referenceLink;
    private String extraContent;

    private List<Long> tags;
}

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/dto/post/PostRequestDto.java between lines 8
and 21, add appropriate validation annotations such as @NotNull, @NotEmpty, or
@Size to the DTO fields to ensure data integrity. Review each field's
requirements and apply relevant javax.validation.constraints annotations to
enforce constraints like non-nullability and string length limits.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/FollowService.java (1)

63-64: ⚠️ Potential issue

에러 코드가 상황에 맞지 않습니다.

SELF_UNFOLLOW_NOT_ALLOWED 에러 코드를 사용하고 있지만, 실제로는 팔로우 관계가 존재하지 않는 경우의 예외입니다. FOLLOW_RELATIONSHIP_NOT_FOUND 같은 더 적절한 에러 코드를 사용하는 것이 좋겠습니다.

        Follow follow = followRepository.findByFollowerIdAndFollowingId(follower, following)
-                .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomException(ErrorCode.SELF_UNFOLLOW_NOT_ALLOWED));
+                .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomException(ErrorCode.FOLLOW_RELATIONSHIP_NOT_FOUND));

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        Follow follow = followRepository.findByFollowerIdAndFollowingId(follower, following)
-               .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomException(ErrorCode.SELF_UNFOLLOW_NOT_ALLOWED));
+               .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomException(ErrorCode.FOLLOW_RELATIONSHIP_NOT_FOUND));

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/FollowService.java around lines 63
to 64, the exception thrown when the follow relationship is not found uses the
incorrect error code SELF_UNFOLLOW_NOT_ALLOWED. Replace this with a more
appropriate error code such as FOLLOW_RELATIONSHIP_NOT_FOUND to accurately
reflect the situation where the follow relationship does not exist.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/controller/FollowController.java (1)

33-40: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

RESTful API 설계를 개선해 주세요.

언팔로우 기능이 POST /follow/unfollow로 구현되어 있는데, REST 관례에 따르면 DELETE /follow/{targetMemberId} 방식이 더 적절합니다.

RESTful 설계로 변경하는 것을 고려해 보세요:

-    @PostMapping("/unfollow")
-    public ResponseEntity<Response<Void>> unfollow(
-            @RequestBody UnfollowRequestDto requestDto,
-            @RequestParam String requesterEmail) {
-
-        followService.unfollow(requesterEmail, requestDto.getTargetMemberId());
+    @DeleteMapping("/{targetMemberId}")
+    public ResponseEntity<Response<Void>> unfollow(
+            @PathVariable Long targetMemberId,
+            @RequestParam String requesterEmail) {
+
+        followService.unfollow(requesterEmail, targetMemberId);
         return ResponseEntity.ok(Response.success("언팔로우 완료", null));
     }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @DeleteMapping("/{targetMemberId}")
    public ResponseEntity<Response<Void>> unfollow(
            @PathVariable Long targetMemberId,
            @RequestParam String requesterEmail) {

        followService.unfollow(requesterEmail, targetMemberId);
        return ResponseEntity.ok(Response.success("언팔로우 완료", null));
    }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/controller/FollowController.java around
lines 33 to 40, the unfollow API uses POST /unfollow which is not RESTful.
Change the endpoint to DELETE /follow/{targetMemberId} by moving targetMemberId
to the path variable and removing the request body. Adjust the method signature
to accept @PathVariable Long targetMemberId and @RequestParam String
requesterEmail, then call followService.unfollow(requesterEmail,
targetMemberId). Return the success response as before.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/exception/ErrorCode.java (1)

11-11: ⚠️ Potential issue

오타를 수정해주세요.

USER_EMAIL_NOT_FOUNT에 오타가 있습니다.

다음과 같이 수정해주세요:

-    USER_EMAIL_NOT_FOUNT(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND, "회원 이메일을 찾을 수 없습니다."),
+    USER_EMAIL_NOT_FOUND(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND, "회원 이메일을 찾을 수 없습니다."),

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    USER_EMAIL_NOT_FOUND(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND, "회원 이메일을 찾을 수 없습니다."),

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/exception/ErrorCode.java at line 11, there
is a typo in the enum constant name USER_EMAIL_NOT_FOUNT. Correct the typo by
renaming it to USER_EMAIL_NOT_FOUND to accurately reflect the intended meaning.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/PostService.java (4)

50-52: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

변수명을 의미에 맞게 수정해주세요.

userId와 postId 변수명이 실제 타입과 맞지 않아 혼란을 야기할 수 있습니다.

다음과 같이 명확한 변수명으로 변경하는 것을 권장합니다:

-        Member userId = memberRepository.findById(userIdInput)
+        Member member = memberRepository.findById(userIdInput)
                 .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomException(ErrorCode.USER_ID_NOT_FOUND));

-        Post postId = postRepository.findById(postIdInput)
+        Post post = postRepository.findById(postIdInput)
                 .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomException(ErrorCode.POST_NOT_FOUND));

Also applies to: 96-98, 118-120

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/PostService.java around lines 50 to
52, 96 to 98, and 118 to 120, the variable names userId and postId do not
accurately reflect their actual types, causing confusion. Rename variables so
that those holding Member objects are named user or member, and those holding
Long IDs are named userId or postId accordingly. This will improve code clarity
and maintain consistency with the variable types.

---

125-125: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

북마크 폴더 로직의 제한사항을 개선해주세요.

현재 코드는 사용자당 하나의 폴더만 있다고 가정하고 있어 확장성에 제한이 있습니다.

다음과 같은 개선을 고려해보세요:

1. 기본 폴더를 명시적으로 조회하는 방법
2. 폴더 ID를 파라미터로 받는 방법
3. 기본 폴더가 없을 경우의 예외 처리

-        BookmarkFolder folderId = bookmarkFolderRepository.findByUserId(userId);
+        BookmarkFolder bookmarkFolder = bookmarkFolderRepository.findDefaultByUserId(userId)
+                .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomException(ErrorCode.FOLDER_NOT_FOUND));

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/PostService.java at line 125, the
current code assumes only one bookmark folder per user by using findByUserId,
which limits scalability. Modify the method to either accept a folder ID as a
parameter or explicitly query for a default folder. Add proper exception
handling for cases where the default folder does not exist to ensure robustness.

---

36-45: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Lombok @requiredargsconstructor 사용을 권장합니다.

수동으로 생성자를 작성하는 대신 Lombok의 @RequiredArgsConstructor를 사용하면 코드가 더 간결해지고 유지보수가 쉬워집니다.

다음과 같이 리팩토링할 수 있습니다:

+import lombok.RequiredArgsConstructor;
+
 @Service
+@RequiredArgsConstructor
 public class PostService {
     private final PostRepository postRepository;
     private final MemberRepository memberRepository;
     private final PostLikeRepository postLikeRepository;
     private final BookmarkRepository bookmarkRepository;
     private final TagRepository tagRepository;
     private final BookmarkFolderRepository bookmarkFolderRepository;
-
-    public PostService(PostRepository postRepository, MemberRepository memberRepository,
-                       PostLikeRepository postLikeRepository, BookmarkRepository bookmarkRepository,
-                       TagRepository tagRepository, BookmarkFolderRepository bookmarkFolderRepository){
-        this.postRepository = postRepository;
-        this.memberRepository = memberRepository;
-        this.postLikeRepository = postLikeRepository;
-        this.bookmarkRepository = bookmarkRepository;
-        this.tagRepository = tagRepository;
-        this.bookmarkFolderRepository = bookmarkFolderRepository;
-    }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

import lombok.RequiredArgsConstructor;

@Service
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class PostService {
    private final PostRepository postRepository;
    private final MemberRepository memberRepository;
    private final PostLikeRepository postLikeRepository;
    private final BookmarkRepository bookmarkRepository;
    private final TagRepository tagRepository;
    private final BookmarkFolderRepository bookmarkFolderRepository;

    // ... existing service methods ...
}

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/PostService.java around lines 36 to
45, the constructor is manually written to inject dependencies. Replace the
explicit constructor with Lombok's @RequiredArgsConstructor annotation on the
class to automatically generate a constructor for all final fields, making the
code cleaner and easier to maintain. Remove the existing constructor after
adding the annotation.

---

54-56: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

하드코딩된 기본값을 상수로 분리해주세요.

기본 커버 이미지 URL이 하드코딩되어 있습니다.

다음과 같이 상수로 분리하는 것을 권장합니다:

+    private static final String DEFAULT_COVER_IMAGE_URL = "default-cover-image-url";
+
     // 게시글 생성하기
     @Transactional
     public void createPost(PostRequestDto postRequestDto){
         // ...
         String coverImageUrl = postRequestDto.getCoverImageUrl();
         if (coverImageUrl == null || coverImageUrl.isBlank())
-            coverImageUrl = "url";
+            coverImageUrl = DEFAULT_COVER_IMAGE_URL;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // class-level constant for default cover image
    private static final String DEFAULT_COVER_IMAGE_URL = "default-cover-image-url";

    // 게시글 생성하기
    @Transactional
    public void createPost(PostRequestDto postRequestDto){
        // ...
        String coverImageUrl = postRequestDto.getCoverImageUrl();
        if (coverImageUrl == null || coverImageUrl.isBlank())
            coverImageUrl = DEFAULT_COVER_IMAGE_URL;
        // ...
    }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/PostService.java around lines 54 to
56, the default cover image URL is hardcoded as a string literal. To improve
maintainability, define this default URL as a private static final constant at
the class level and replace the hardcoded string with this constant in the code.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/post/Post.java (1)

76-94: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

생성자 매개변수가 너무 많습니다.

생성자에 14개의 매개변수가 있어 가독성과 유지보수성이 떨어집니다.

Builder 패턴을 사용하는 것을 권장합니다:

+import lombok.Builder;

 @Entity
 @Getter
+@Builder
 @NoArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PROTECTED)
+@AllArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PRIVATE)
 public class Post {
     // ... fields ...
-
-    public Post(Member userId, String postTitle, String coverImage, String problem, String errorMessage,
-                String environment, String reproduceCode, String solutionCode, String causeAnalysis,
-                String referenceLink, String extraContent, LocalDateTime createdAt, LocalDateTime editedAt){
-        this.userId = userId;
-        this.postTitle = postTitle;
-        this.coverImage = coverImage;
-        this.problem = problem;
-        this.errorMessage = errorMessage;
-        this.environment = environment;
-        this.reproduceCode = reproduceCode;
-        this.solutionCode = solutionCode;
-        this.causeAnalysis = causeAnalysis;
-        this.referenceLink = referenceLink;
-        this.extraContent = extraContent;
-        this.createdAt = createdAt;
-        this.editedAt = editedAt;
-        // 게시글 이미지
-        // 게시글 태그
-    }
 }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/domain/post/Post.java around lines 76 to 94,
the constructor has too many parameters (14), which reduces readability and
maintainability. Refactor this by implementing the Builder pattern for the Post
class. Create a static inner Builder class with methods to set each field and a
build() method to construct the Post instance, then replace the current
constructor usage with the builder to improve clarity and ease of object
creation.

src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/controller/BookmarkFolderController.java (4)

54-63: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

API 엔드포인트 설계를 재검토하세요.

북마크 이동 기능이 /bookmark-folders/{bookmarkId}/move 경로에 있는데, 이는 북마크 폴더 리소스 하위에 북마크 ID가 오는 혼란스러운 구조입니다. 북마크 관련 작업은 별도의 북마크 컨트롤러나 다른 경로에서 처리하는 것이 REST API 설계 원칙에 더 적합합니다.

다음과 같은 대안을 고려해보세요:

1. /bookmarks/{bookmarkId}/move (별도 BookmarkController에서)
2. /bookmark-folders/{folderId}/bookmarks/{bookmarkId} (PUT 메소드로 북마크를 폴더에 할당)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/controller/BookmarkFolderController.java
around lines 54 to 63, the API endpoint path for moving a bookmark is
incorrectly placed under the bookmark-folder resource, causing confusion.
Refactor the endpoint to follow REST principles by moving this method to a
BookmarkController with the path /bookmarks/{bookmarkId}/move or alternatively
redesign it as a PUT method at
/bookmark-folders/{folderId}/bookmarks/{bookmarkId} to assign the bookmark to a
folder. Update the controller and routing accordingly to reflect this clearer
resource hierarchy.

---

23-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

리턴 타입의 일관성을 개선하세요.

다른 메소드들은 구체적인 제네릭 타입을 사용하는데, 이 메소드만 ResponseEntity<?>를 사용하고 있습니다.

-    public ResponseEntity<?> createFolder(
+    public ResponseEntity<Response<BookmarkFolderCreateResponse>> createFolder(

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/controller/BookmarkFolderController.java
around lines 23 to 31, the createFolder method uses a generic ResponseEntity<?>
as its return type, which is inconsistent with other methods that specify a
concrete generic type. Change the return type from ResponseEntity<?> to
ResponseEntity<Response<BookmarkFolderCreateResponse>> to match the specific
response structure and maintain consistency across the controller methods.

---

44-52: ⚠️ Potential issue

경로 변수 이름 불일치를 수정하세요.

@RequestMapping의 {folder_id}와 @PathVariable의 folderId 사이에 명명 규칙 불일치가 있습니다.

-    @PatchMapping("/{folder_id}")
+    @PatchMapping("/{folderId}")
     public ResponseEntity<Response<Void>> updateFolderName(
             @PathVariable Long folderId,

또는 @PathVariable 어노테이션에 명시적으로 이름을 지정할 수 있습니다:

-            @PathVariable Long folderId,
+            @PathVariable("folder_id") Long folderId,

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    @PatchMapping("/{folderId}")
    public ResponseEntity<Response<Void>> updateFolderName(
            @PathVariable Long folderId,
            @RequestParam String requesterEmail,
            @RequestBody BookmarkFolderUpdateRequest request
    ) {
        bookmarkFolderService.updateFolderName(folderId, requesterEmail, request.folderName());
        return ResponseEntity.ok(Response.success("폴더 이름 수정 완료", null));
    }

    @PatchMapping("/{folder_id}")
    public ResponseEntity<Response<Void>> updateFolderName(
            @PathVariable("folder_id") Long folderId,
            @RequestParam String requesterEmail,
            @RequestBody BookmarkFolderUpdateRequest request
    ) {
        bookmarkFolderService.updateFolderName(folderId, requesterEmail, request.folderName());
        return ResponseEntity.ok(Response.success("폴더 이름 수정 완료", null));
    }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/controller/BookmarkFolderController.java
around lines 44 to 52, the path variable name in @PatchMapping is {folder_id}
but the @PathVariable parameter is named folderId, causing a mismatch. Fix this
by either renaming the @PathVariable parameter to folder_id to match the path or
explicitly specify the name in the @PathVariable annotation as
@PathVariable("folder_id") Long folderId to ensure they align.

---

34-41: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

페이지네이션 검증을 추가하세요.

페이지 번호에 대한 검증이 없어 음수나 잘못된 값이 전달될 수 있습니다.

다음 스크립트로 페이지 검증 로직이 서비스 레이어에 구현되어 있는지 확인하세요:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if page validation exists in BookmarkFolderService
ast-grep --pattern 'class BookmarkFolderService {
  $$$
  getFoldersByEmail($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 105

---

서비스 레이어 페이지 검증 로직을 다시 확인하기 위해 아래 스크립트를 실행해 주세요.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# 1) BookmarkFolderService 클래스 위치 및 getFoldersByEmail 메서드 구현 확인
rg "class BookmarkFolderService" -n src
rg "getFoldersByEmail" -n src

# 2) 페이지 파라미터에 대한 검증(if 조건) 검색 (음수 또는 0 이하)
rg "if.*page.*<.*0" -n src
rg "if.*page.*<=.*0" -n src

Length of output: 577

---

서비스 레이어의 getFoldersByEmail 메서드 내부 구현 및 PageRequest.of 호출 여부를 확인하려면 아래 스크립트를 실행해 주세요.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# 1) getFoldersByEmail 메서드 본문 확인 (10줄 이후까지)
rg -A 10 -n "getFoldersByEmail" src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/BookmarkFolderService.java

# 2) PageRequest.of 호출 여부 확인
rg "PageRequest.of" -n src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/BookmarkFolderService.java

Length of output: 930

---

페이지네이션 페이지 번호 검증 로직 추가 필요

현재 서비스 레이어에서 PageRequest.of(page - 1, 10)만 사용하고 있어, page ≤ 0일 경우 IllegalArgumentException이 발생하며 500 에러로 이어집니다. 유효하지 않은 페이지 요청을 미리 걸러내는 검증 로직을 추가해주세요.

대상 위치

• src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/controller/BookmarkFolderController.java
• src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/service/BookmarkFolderService.java

제안 사항

• 컨트롤러 레벨에서 파라미터 검증

  @RestController

• @validated
  @RequestMapping("/folders")
  public class BookmarkFolderController {

  @GetMapping
  public ResponseEntity<Response<BookmarkFolderPageResponse>> getFolders(
          @RequestParam String requesterEmail,
  

  •       @RequestParam int page
    

  •       @RequestParam @Min(value = 1, message = "페이지 번호는 1 이상의 값이어야 합니다") int page
    

    ) {
    …
    }
    }

• 서비스 레벨에서 수동 검증

  public BookmarkFolderPageResponse getFoldersByEmail(String email, int page) {
      if (page < 1) {
          throw new CustomException(ErrorCode.INVALID_PAGE_NUMBER);
      }
      
      Pageable pageable = PageRequest.of(page - 1, 10);
      …
  }

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In src/main/java/com/example/fixlog/controller/BookmarkFolderController.java
lines 34-41 and the corresponding service file, add validation for the page
parameter to prevent invalid values like zero or negative numbers. In the
controller, validate the page parameter before calling the service and return a
proper error response if invalid. In the service method getFoldersByEmail, add a
check to throw a custom exception if page is less than 1 before creating the
PageRequest. This prevents IllegalArgumentException and avoids 500 errors by
handling invalid pagination requests early.